A framework for systematic conservation planning and management of Mediterranean landscapes

Noam Levin*, James E.M. Watson, Liana N. Joseph, Hedley S. Grantham, Liat Hadar, Naomi Apel, Avi Perevolotsky, Niv DeMalach, Hugh P. Possingham, Salit Kark

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations


Active and dynamic management of biodiversity is of utmost importance in the face of increasing human pressures on nature. Current approaches for site selection of protected areas often assume that both conservation features and management actions are fixed in space and time. However, this approach should be revised to allow for spatio-temporal shifts of biodiversity features, threats and management options. Our aim here was to demonstrate a novel approach for systematic conservation planning at a fine scale that incorporates dynamic ecological processes (e.g., succession), biodiversity targets and management costs. We used the new 'Marxan with Zones' decision support tool to spatially redistribute the major structural types of vegetation within a privately-owned nature park in Israel and facilitate the achievement of multiple conservation targets for minimum cost. The park is located in the Mediterranean climate region of the eastern Mediterranean Basin, one of Earth's richest biodiversity hotspots. This small park alone (4.5km2) holds 660 species of native plants and six structural types of vegetation. The region has been subject to manifold human pressures such as grazing, clearing and fire for millennia and is currently threatened by a range of modern human-related activities (e.g., invasive alien species). By spatially redistributing the six structural vegetation types under three scenarios, representing different conservation objectives (no change, equal distribution - evenness of structural types, preference to early succession stages) within three budget frameworks, we identified a set of near-optimal conservation strategies that can be enacted over time. The current spatial distribution of structural types and the cost of changing one structural type into another via management actions had a major impact on the spatial prioritization outcomes and management recommendations. Notably, an advanced successional stage (dense Mediterranean garrigue) tended to dominate a large portion of the landscape when the available budgets were low because it is a relatively inexpensive structural type to maintain. The approach presented here can be further applied to spatially prioritize conservation goals in the face of shifting environments and climates, allowing dynamic conservation planning at multiple spatial scales.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)371-383
Number of pages13
JournalBiological Conservation
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Matt Watts for his help with Marxan with Zones, the Ramat Hanadiv Park staff for their assistance and Carissa Klein for comments on the manuscript. Hugh Possingham was supported by an ARC Federation Fellowship. We thank the two anonymous reviewers whose suggestions helped to improve the clarity of the manuscript.


  • Conservation planning
  • Decision support tools
  • Local scale management
  • Marxan
  • Mediterranean ecosystems
  • Succession


Dive into the research topics of 'A framework for systematic conservation planning and management of Mediterranean landscapes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this