TY - JOUR
T1 - A note on minimising total absolute deviation of job completion times on a two-machine no-wait proportionate flowshop
AU - Ben-Yehoshua, Yoav
AU - Hariri, Eyal
AU - Mosheiov, Gur
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2015/10/2
Y1 - 2015/10/2
N2 - A popular measure used in service systems is that of total absolute deviation of job completion times (TADC). It is relevant to settings where the objective is to balance the level of service provided to different customers. During the last decade, TADC has been studied in various machine settings, and under various assumptions on the job processing times. In this note, we study TADC on a two-machine no-wait proportionate flow shop, i.e. a flow shop with machine-independent processing times, and with no buffer between the machines. A very surprising and unique result is introduced: a simple index policy (the well-known largest processing time (LPT) first sequence) is shown to be optimal for instances of no more than seven jobs. This property does not hold for larger instances. We show that for instances of eight and nine jobs, there are exactly two schedules which are candidates for optimality. For the 10-job instance, the number of candidates increases. This uncommon behaviour of the optimal solution and, consequently, the complexity of the problem studied here, remain open questions, and are challenging topics for future research.
AB - A popular measure used in service systems is that of total absolute deviation of job completion times (TADC). It is relevant to settings where the objective is to balance the level of service provided to different customers. During the last decade, TADC has been studied in various machine settings, and under various assumptions on the job processing times. In this note, we study TADC on a two-machine no-wait proportionate flow shop, i.e. a flow shop with machine-independent processing times, and with no buffer between the machines. A very surprising and unique result is introduced: a simple index policy (the well-known largest processing time (LPT) first sequence) is shown to be optimal for instances of no more than seven jobs. This property does not hold for larger instances. We show that for instances of eight and nine jobs, there are exactly two schedules which are candidates for optimality. For the 10-job instance, the number of candidates increases. This uncommon behaviour of the optimal solution and, consequently, the complexity of the problem studied here, remain open questions, and are challenging topics for future research.
KW - no-wait
KW - proportionate flow shop
KW - scheduling
KW - total absolute deviations of job completion times
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938971875&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00207543.2014.991843
DO - 10.1080/00207543.2014.991843
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84938971875
SN - 0020-7543
VL - 53
SP - 5717
EP - 5724
JO - International Journal of Production Research
JF - International Journal of Production Research
IS - 19
ER -