TY - JOUR
T1 - A road map for in vivo evolution experiments with blood-borne parasitic microbes
AU - Rodríguez-Pastor, Ruth
AU - Shafran, Yarden
AU - Knossow, Nadav
AU - Gutiérrez, Ricardo
AU - Harrus, Shimon
AU - Zaman, Luis
AU - Lenski, Richard E.
AU - Barrick, Jeffrey E.
AU - Hawlena, Hadas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Resources published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Laboratory experiments in which blood-borne parasitic microbes evolve in their animal hosts offer an opportunity to study parasite evolution and adaptation in real time and under natural settings. The main challenge of these experiments is to establish a protocol that is both practical over multiple passages and accurately reflects natural transmission scenarios and mechanisms. We provide a guide to the steps that should be considered when designing such a protocol, and we demonstrate its use via a case study. We highlight the importance of choosing suitable ancestral genotypes, treatments, number of replicates per treatment, types of negative controls, dependent variables, covariates, and the timing of checkpoints for the experimental design. We also recommend specific preliminary experiments to determine effective methods for parasite quantification, transmission, and preservation. Although these methodological considerations are technical, they also often have conceptual implications. To this end, we encourage other researchers to design and conduct in vivo evolution experiments with blood-borne parasitic microbes, despite the challenges that the work entails.
AB - Laboratory experiments in which blood-borne parasitic microbes evolve in their animal hosts offer an opportunity to study parasite evolution and adaptation in real time and under natural settings. The main challenge of these experiments is to establish a protocol that is both practical over multiple passages and accurately reflects natural transmission scenarios and mechanisms. We provide a guide to the steps that should be considered when designing such a protocol, and we demonstrate its use via a case study. We highlight the importance of choosing suitable ancestral genotypes, treatments, number of replicates per treatment, types of negative controls, dependent variables, covariates, and the timing of checkpoints for the experimental design. We also recommend specific preliminary experiments to determine effective methods for parasite quantification, transmission, and preservation. Although these methodological considerations are technical, they also often have conceptual implications. To this end, we encourage other researchers to design and conduct in vivo evolution experiments with blood-borne parasitic microbes, despite the challenges that the work entails.
KW - Bartonella spp.
KW - experimental evolution
KW - host–parasite adaptation
KW - in vivo experiments
KW - microbial pathogens
KW - population bottlenecks
KW - sequential passages
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131602457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1755-0998.13649
DO - 10.1111/1755-0998.13649
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.systematicreview???
C2 - 35599628
AN - SCOPUS:85131602457
SN - 1755-098X
VL - 22
SP - 2843
EP - 2859
JO - Molecular Ecology Resources
JF - Molecular Ecology Resources
IS - 8
ER -