TY - JOUR
T1 - A Threat to Cohesion
T2 - Intragroup Affective Polarization in the Context of Intractable Intergroup Conflict
AU - Harel, Tal Orian
AU - Nir, Nimrod
AU - Vandermeulen, Daan
AU - Maoz, Ifat
AU - Halperin, Eran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - Growing affective polarization, or animosity between competing ideological groups, threatens to tear apart democratic societies worldwide. In nations that are facing external conflicts, the threat arising from these conflicts may boost internal cohesion and potentially reduce the internal threat of fragmentation. However, in the current study, we analyze survey datasets from two societies embedded in intractable conflicts, South Korea (N = 897) and Israel (N = 504), and demonstrate that gaps in the perception of the external threat between competing ideological groups are related to higher levels of affective polarization within these societies. We also find support for a mechanism that explains this trend: an internal threat from the ideological outgroup. We discuss the implications of our findings for the study of conflicts' impact on intragroup processes, specifically affective polarization, and for the understanding of how such processes might perpetuate the conflict itself.
AB - Growing affective polarization, or animosity between competing ideological groups, threatens to tear apart democratic societies worldwide. In nations that are facing external conflicts, the threat arising from these conflicts may boost internal cohesion and potentially reduce the internal threat of fragmentation. However, in the current study, we analyze survey datasets from two societies embedded in intractable conflicts, South Korea (N = 897) and Israel (N = 504), and demonstrate that gaps in the perception of the external threat between competing ideological groups are related to higher levels of affective polarization within these societies. We also find support for a mechanism that explains this trend: an internal threat from the ideological outgroup. We discuss the implications of our findings for the study of conflicts' impact on intragroup processes, specifically affective polarization, and for the understanding of how such processes might perpetuate the conflict itself.
KW - affective polarization
KW - intergroup and intragroup processes
KW - intractable conflicts
KW - threat
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85190803389
U2 - 10.1177/00220027241247033
DO - 10.1177/00220027241247033
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85190803389
SN - 0022-0027
VL - 69
SP - 491
EP - 517
JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution
JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution
IS - 2-3
ER -