TY - JOUR
T1 - Accountability and hybridity in welfare governance
AU - Benish, Avishai
AU - Mattei, Paola
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Hybridity has become a central characteristic of accountability in public governance. Contemporary service delivery is increasingly defined by the mixing and layering of public, market and social accountability regimes operating as overlapping ‘hybrid’ accountability arrangements. Although hybrid accountability is not a new phenomenon, recent trends have accelerated the process of hybridization, particularly in welfare state governance. In this symposium, we seek to advance our understanding of the under-theorized concept of hybrid accountability and empirically examine what is actually going on. In this introductory article, we put forward a definition of what hybridity means in public welfare governance and explore its origins and dynamics. We then present the articles of this symposium, showing how they go beyond fixed and static typologies to grasp the dynamics of interactions between actors, values and mechanisms under hybrid accountability. We conclude by reflecting on a future research agenda for studying hybrid accountability arrangements.
AB - Hybridity has become a central characteristic of accountability in public governance. Contemporary service delivery is increasingly defined by the mixing and layering of public, market and social accountability regimes operating as overlapping ‘hybrid’ accountability arrangements. Although hybrid accountability is not a new phenomenon, recent trends have accelerated the process of hybridization, particularly in welfare state governance. In this symposium, we seek to advance our understanding of the under-theorized concept of hybrid accountability and empirically examine what is actually going on. In this introductory article, we put forward a definition of what hybridity means in public welfare governance and explore its origins and dynamics. We then present the articles of this symposium, showing how they go beyond fixed and static typologies to grasp the dynamics of interactions between actors, values and mechanisms under hybrid accountability. We conclude by reflecting on a future research agenda for studying hybrid accountability arrangements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086817165&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/padm.12640
DO - 10.1111/padm.12640
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85086817165
SN - 0033-3298
VL - 98
SP - 281
EP - 290
JO - Public Administration
JF - Public Administration
IS - 2
ER -