American affective polarization in comparative perspective

Noam Gidron, James F Adams, Will Horne

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

American political observers express increasing concern about affective polarization, i.e., partisans' resentment toward political opponents. We advance debates about America's partisan divisions by comparing affective polarization in the US over the past 25 years with affective polarization in 19 other western publics. We conclude that American affective polarization is not extreme in comparative perspective, although Americans' dislike of partisan opponents has increased more rapidly since the mid-1990s than in most other Western publics. We then show that affective polarization is more intense when unemployment and inequality are high; when political elites clash over cultural issues such as immigration and national identity; and in countries with majoritarian electoral institutions. Our findings situate American partisan resentment and hostility in comparative perspective, and illuminate correlates of affective polarization that are difficult to detect when examining the American case in isolation.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCambridge
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages85
ISBN (Electronic)1108914128
StatePublished - 2020

Publication series

NameCambridge elements. Elements in American politics
PublisherCambridge University Press
ISSN (Electronic)2515-1606

Bibliographical note

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 29 Oct 2020).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'American affective polarization in comparative perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this