Abstract
Two studies examined the possible moderating role of hardiness on reactions to mortality salience inductions. A sample of 240 Israeli undergraduate students completed a hardiness scale, were exposed to a mortality salience or control induction, and then either rated the severity and punishment of 10 social transgressions (Study 1, N = 120) or performed a word-stem completion task, which tapped the accessibility of death-related thoughts (Study 2, N = 120). Results indicated that a mortality salience induction led to more severe judgments of social transgressions as well as to more severe punishments than a control induction only among participants scoring low in the hardiness scale. However, a mortality salience induction led to a higher cognitive accessibility of death-related thoughts than a control condition regardless of participants' hardiness scores. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering inner resources when examining reactions to mortality reminders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 437-453 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | British Journal of Social Psychology |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2001 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An existentialist view on mortality salience effects: Personal hardiness, death-thought accessibility, and cultural worldview defence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver