An integrative framework of conflict and control

Daniela Becker*, Erik Bijleveld, Senne Braem, Kerstin Fröber, Felix J. Götz, Tali Kleiman, Anita Körner, Roland Pfister, Andrea M.F. Reiter, Blair Saunders, Iris K. Schneider, Alexander Soutschek, Henk van Steenbergen, David Dignath

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

People regularly encounter various types of conflict. Here, we ask if, and, if so, how, different types of conflict, from lab-based Stroop conflicts to everyday-life self-control or moral conflicts, are related to one other. We present a framework that assumes that action–goal representations are hierarchically organized, ranging from concrete actions to abstract goals. The framework's key assumption is that conflicts involving more abstract goals (e.g., self-control/moral conflict) are embedded in a more complex action space; thus, to resolve such conflicts, people need to consider more associated goals and actions. We discuss how differences in complexity impact conflict resolution mechanisms and the costs/benefits of resolving conflicts. Altogether, we offer a new way to conceptualize and analyze conflict regulation across different domains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)757-768
Number of pages12
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024

Keywords

  • cognitive control
  • complexity
  • conflict
  • conflict resolution
  • moral decision making
  • self-control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An integrative framework of conflict and control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this