Abstract
People regularly encounter various types of conflict. Here, we ask if, and, if so, how, different types of conflict, from lab-based Stroop conflicts to everyday-life self-control or moral conflicts, are related to one other. We present a framework that assumes that action–goal representations are hierarchically organized, ranging from concrete actions to abstract goals. The framework's key assumption is that conflicts involving more abstract goals (e.g., self-control/moral conflict) are embedded in a more complex action space; thus, to resolve such conflicts, people need to consider more associated goals and actions. We discuss how differences in complexity impact conflict resolution mechanisms and the costs/benefits of resolving conflicts. Altogether, we offer a new way to conceptualize and analyze conflict regulation across different domains.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 757-768 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024
Keywords
- cognitive control
- complexity
- conflict
- conflict resolution
- moral decision making
- self-control
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An integrative framework of conflict and control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver