An integrative framework of conflict and control

  • Daniela Becker*
  • , Erik Bijleveld
  • , Senne Braem
  • , Kerstin Fröber
  • , Felix J. Götz
  • , Tali Kleiman
  • , Anita Körner
  • , Roland Pfister
  • , Andrea M.F. Reiter
  • , Blair Saunders
  • , Iris K. Schneider
  • , Alexander Soutschek
  • , Henk van Steenbergen
  • , David Dignath
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

People regularly encounter various types of conflict. Here, we ask if, and, if so, how, different types of conflict, from lab-based Stroop conflicts to everyday-life self-control or moral conflicts, are related to one other. We present a framework that assumes that action–goal representations are hierarchically organized, ranging from concrete actions to abstract goals. The framework's key assumption is that conflicts involving more abstract goals (e.g., self-control/moral conflict) are embedded in a more complex action space; thus, to resolve such conflicts, people need to consider more associated goals and actions. We discuss how differences in complexity impact conflict resolution mechanisms and the costs/benefits of resolving conflicts. Altogether, we offer a new way to conceptualize and analyze conflict regulation across different domains.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)757-768
Number of pages12
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024

Keywords

  • cognitive control
  • complexity
  • conflict
  • conflict resolution
  • moral decision making
  • self-control

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An integrative framework of conflict and control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this