Analyticity and Justification in Frege

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

That there are analytic truths may challenge a principle of the homogeneity of truth. Unlike standard conceptions, in which analyticity is couched in terms of "truth in virtue of meanings", Frege's notions of analytic and a priori concern justification, respecting a principle of the homogeneity of truth. Where there is no justification these notions do not apply, Frege insists. Basic truths and axioms may be analytic (or a priori), though unprovable, which means there is a form of justification which is not (deductive) proof. This is also required for regarding singular factual propositions as a posteriori. A Fregean direction for explicating this wider notion of justification is suggested in terms of his notion of sense (Sinn)-modes in which what the axioms are about are given-and its general epistemological significance is sketched.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-184
Number of pages20
JournalErkenntnis
Volume73
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analyticity and Justification in Frege'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this