Anchoring Legal Standards

Yuval Feldman, Amos Schurr, Doron Teichman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations


This article presents the first empirical study on whether anchors influence the interpretation of vague legal standards. To test this question, the article presents a series of stylized experiments that measure and compare participants' interpretation of a vague norm after they were exposed to anchors. Overall, the results suggest that the content of substantive legal rules might be altered by anchors. This effect is documented in numerous legal settings (e.g., torts, corporate, copyright) and across both expert (i.e., experienced lawyers) and nonexpert (i.e., students) populations. Furthermore, the effect is shown to exist both when participants express judgments on a numeric scale and when they make dichotomous judgments that are detached from that scale. Based on these findings, the article revisits several long-standing legal debates and reevaluates their conclusions.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)298-329
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Empirical Legal Studies
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Cornell Law School and Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.


Dive into the research topics of 'Anchoring Legal Standards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this