Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Apostasy and Conversion: Attachment Orientations and Individual Differences in the Process of Religious Change

  • Yaakov Greenwald*
  • , Mario Mikulincer
  • , Pehr Granqvist
  • , Phillip R. Shaver
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

We studied attachment-related variations in the process of apostasy (abandonment of religion) and compared these variations to those occurring in religious conversion. A sample of 280 Israeli Jews who had undergone religious change (apostasy or conversion) completed scales assessing attachment orientations, themes/motives and other characteristics of religious change, and well-being. Attachment orientations had similar associations with the two forms of religious change. Specifically, attachment anxiety was associated with reports of more sudden changes, more rejection of parents’ religiosity, and more emotional compensation themes. Attachment-related avoidance was associated with weaker exploration and socialization themes. Moreover, compensation themes, for both forms of religious change, were associated with lower well-being at present and a heightened link between attachment anxiety and distress. Socialization themes were related to greater well-being at present and a weakened link between attachment anxiety and distress. Implications for an attachment-theoretical approach to the study of life transformations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)425-436
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology of Religion and Spirituality
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Psychological Association

Keywords

  • apostasy
  • attachment
  • conversion
  • mental health
  • religion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Apostasy and Conversion: Attachment Orientations and Individual Differences in the Process of Religious Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this