Abstract
The derivation of ionic Stokes radii, r iSt, from ion mobilities (conductivities λ i ∞) and their relation to the actual ionic radii, of the bare or the hydrated ions, is followed through the years. It is concluded that such quantities as r iSt do not convey any useful information beyond what is already available in the λ i ∞, and in particular that the r iSt should not be used for the estimation of solvation numbers. The concept of a Stokes radius of ions that are smaller than or commensurate with molecules of the solvent should be scrapped altogether.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2082-2090 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Solution Chemistry |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2012 |
Keywords
- Dielectric friction
- Hydrated ion radius
- Hydration number
- Ionic Stokes radius
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Are ionic stokes radii of any use?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver