Are positive illusions about academic competence always adaptive, under all circumstances: New results and future directions

Ruth Butler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

The papers in this special issue provide a comprehensive examination of the prevalence and implications of positive biases in perceived academic competence at different ages in different countries. Main results showed that marked positive biases were rare, were associated with performance goals, were more adaptive than negative biases, but were not necessarily less adaptive than realistic self-views. I discuss the papers within an analysis of theoretical shifts from early emphases on the benefits of veridical self-appraisal, through emphases on the benefits of positive illusions, to recent inquiry into the possibility that positive biases have both benefits and costs. I suggest how the functions and consequences of positive versus accurate self-appraisals might differ among high and low achievers, and in different learning contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-256
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Educational Research
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Achievement motivation
  • Gender
  • Positive bias
  • Veridical self-evaluation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are positive illusions about academic competence always adaptive, under all circumstances: New results and future directions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this