TY - GEN
T1 - ARE SEARCH AND DECISION PROBLEMS COMPUTATIONALLY EQUIVALENT?
AU - Karp, Richard M.
AU - Upfal, Eli
AU - Wigderson, Avi
PY - 1985
Y1 - 1985
N2 - From the point of view of sequential polynomial time computation, the answer to the question in the title is 'yes'. However, from the point of view of fast parallel computation, the answer is not so clear. Many of the sequential algorithms that were 'marked off' as being 'inherently sequential' embed within them the self-reducibility process. Can this inherently sequential process by parallelized? To study this problem, we define an abstract setting (namely that of an independence system) in which one, universal search problem captures all combinatorial search problems. We consider several natural decision and function oracles to which this search problem may be reduced.
AB - From the point of view of sequential polynomial time computation, the answer to the question in the title is 'yes'. However, from the point of view of fast parallel computation, the answer is not so clear. Many of the sequential algorithms that were 'marked off' as being 'inherently sequential' embed within them the self-reducibility process. Can this inherently sequential process by parallelized? To study this problem, we define an abstract setting (namely that of an independence system) in which one, universal search problem captures all combinatorial search problems. We consider several natural decision and function oracles to which this search problem may be reduced.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021940834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.conference???
AN - SCOPUS:0021940834
SN - 0897911512
T3 - Conference Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
SP - 464
EP - 475
BT - Conference Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
PB - ACM (Order n 508850)
ER -