ARE SEARCH AND DECISION PROBLEMS COMPUTATIONALLY EQUIVALENT?

Richard M. Karp*, Eli Upfal, Avi Wigderson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

From the point of view of sequential polynomial time computation, the answer to the question in the title is 'yes'. However, from the point of view of fast parallel computation, the answer is not so clear. Many of the sequential algorithms that were 'marked off' as being 'inherently sequential' embed within them the self-reducibility process. Can this inherently sequential process by parallelized? To study this problem, we define an abstract setting (namely that of an independence system) in which one, universal search problem captures all combinatorial search problems. We consider several natural decision and function oracles to which this search problem may be reduced.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationConference Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
PublisherACM (Order n 508850)
Pages464-475
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)0897911512
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameConference Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
ISSN (Print)0734-9025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ARE SEARCH AND DECISION PROBLEMS COMPUTATIONALLY EQUIVALENT?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this