Assessment of theoretical methods for complexes of gold(I) and gold(III) with unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon: Which density functional should we choose?

Runhua Kang, Hui Chen*, Sason Shaik, Jiannian Yao

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

110 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gold-substrate interaction is essential in gold-catalyzed organic transformations. This study uses high-level coupled cluster calculations with core-valence correlation and complete basis set (CBS) limit extrapolation as a reference, for assessing the performance of popular density functional theory (DFT) approximations for a variety of Au(I)/Au(III) complexes with unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon CnHm substrates (ethene, ethyne, and allene). The tested functionals cover from LDA to GGA and meta-GGA, and to hybrids and double hybrids (LSDA, PBE, M06-L, TPSS, B3LYP, PBE0, M06, M06-2X, TPSSh, B2-PLYP, B2GP-PLYP). Both the geometry and bond dissociation energy (De) of the Au-CnHm complexes are studied. Our findings show that B2GP-PLYP, PBE0, and B2-PLYP are the best performing functionals for this set of Au-CnHm complexes. DFT dispersion correction (DFT-D3), though very helpful for some functionals (e.g., B3LYP and B2-PLYP), does not uniformly improve the results of all functionals. Ab initio methods like MP2 and SCSMP2 are also tested. MP2 is found to be the worst performing method, and while SCSMP2 greatly improves the results, still its accuracy is lower than that of the best functionals, B2GP-PLYP, PBE0, and B2-PLYP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4002-4011
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Volume7
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 13 Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of theoretical methods for complexes of gold(I) and gold(III) with unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon: Which density functional should we choose?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this