Abstract
In this reply, I focus on the question of whether Cannon's theory was (only) a centralized version of James's. Due to space limitations, I briefly present six observations that problematize this assertion. One of my guiding principles is that theories acquire their meaning within a particular context. From this historical perspective, and in their historical contexts, the theories were quite distinct.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 48-49 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Emotion Review |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2014 |
Keywords
- Cannon
- James
- emotion
- thalamus