Baal oder Boschet? Ein umstrittenes theophores element zwischen religions- und textgeschichte

Translated title of the contribution: Baal or Boschet? - A controversial theopore element between religious and text history

Stefan Schorch*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authenticity of -bšt as a theophoric element in the personal names Jerubbeshet, Ish-boshet und Mephiboshet is still a matter of debate. Scholars mostly consider it being the result of a pious or dysphemistic correction which changed the original ba'al »Baal« into bōšæt »shame«. The word bōšæt, however, may be explained as the Hebrew parallel to akk. bācombining dot belowštu »protective spirit« as well, as suggested by Tsevat and others. Against the common opinion, the second interpretation is confirmed by the transcriptions of the Septuagint. This strengthens the view that the divine epithet bōšæt has left its traces in a few other places of the Hebrew Bible as well (Hos 9,10; Jer 3,24 f.; I Reg 18,19.25).

Translated title of the contributionBaal or Boschet? - A controversial theopore element between religious and text history
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)598-611
Number of pages14
JournalZeitschrift fur die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
Volume112
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Baal or Boschet? - A controversial theopore element between religious and text history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this