Behavioral health treatment redesign in managed care settings

Nancy C. Bologna; David H. Barlow; Steven D. Hollon; James E. Mitchell; Jonathan D. Huppert

doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00138.x

Behavioral health treatment redesign in managed care settings

Nancy C. Bologna^*, David H. Barlow, Steven D. Hollon, James E. Mitchell, Jonathan D. Huppert

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article addresses the general trends and research directions taking place in managed care behavioral health care settings. Such challenges as the demands for accountability and cost-effectiveness have led to the pressing need for (a) sound outcomes measurement systems, (b) standardization of empirically supported treatment protocols, and (c) more concerted efforts to bridge the gap in psychology between efficacy research occurring in controlled, often academic settings, and effectiveness research whereby tested protocols are implemented and evaluated within actual practice settings. The treatment literature of three diagnostic groups - anxiety, mood disorders, and eating disorders - is discussed regarding present empirical support and research directions.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	94-114
Number of pages	21
Journal	Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Volume	5
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00138.x
State	Published - 1998
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Anxiety
Eating disorders
Managed care
Mood disorders
Treatment redesign

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00138.x

Cite this

@article{bc0ee13cedd840f38b0e286627d44b07,

title = "Behavioral health treatment redesign in managed care settings",

abstract = "This article addresses the general trends and research directions taking place in managed care behavioral health care settings. Such challenges as the demands for accountability and cost-effectiveness have led to the pressing need for (a) sound outcomes measurement systems, (b) standardization of empirically supported treatment protocols, and (c) more concerted efforts to bridge the gap in psychology between efficacy research occurring in controlled, often academic settings, and effectiveness research whereby tested protocols are implemented and evaluated within actual practice settings. The treatment literature of three diagnostic groups - anxiety, mood disorders, and eating disorders - is discussed regarding present empirical support and research directions.",

keywords = "Anxiety, Eating disorders, Managed care, Mood disorders, Treatment redesign",

author = "Bologna, {Nancy C.} and Barlow, {David H.} and Hollon, {Steven D.} and Mitchell, {James E.} and Huppert, {Jonathan D.}",

year = "1998",

doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00138.x",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "5",

pages = "94--114",

journal = "Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice",

issn = "0969-5893",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Behavioral health treatment redesign in managed care settings

AU - Bologna, Nancy C.

AU - Barlow, David H.

AU - Hollon, Steven D.

AU - Mitchell, James E.

AU - Huppert, Jonathan D.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This article addresses the general trends and research directions taking place in managed care behavioral health care settings. Such challenges as the demands for accountability and cost-effectiveness have led to the pressing need for (a) sound outcomes measurement systems, (b) standardization of empirically supported treatment protocols, and (c) more concerted efforts to bridge the gap in psychology between efficacy research occurring in controlled, often academic settings, and effectiveness research whereby tested protocols are implemented and evaluated within actual practice settings. The treatment literature of three diagnostic groups - anxiety, mood disorders, and eating disorders - is discussed regarding present empirical support and research directions.

AB - This article addresses the general trends and research directions taking place in managed care behavioral health care settings. Such challenges as the demands for accountability and cost-effectiveness have led to the pressing need for (a) sound outcomes measurement systems, (b) standardization of empirically supported treatment protocols, and (c) more concerted efforts to bridge the gap in psychology between efficacy research occurring in controlled, often academic settings, and effectiveness research whereby tested protocols are implemented and evaluated within actual practice settings. The treatment literature of three diagnostic groups - anxiety, mood disorders, and eating disorders - is discussed regarding present empirical support and research directions.

KW - Anxiety

KW - Eating disorders

KW - Managed care

KW - Mood disorders

KW - Treatment redesign

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002721078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00138.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00138.x

M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???

AN - SCOPUS:0002721078

SN - 0969-5893

VL - 5

SP - 94

EP - 114

JO - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

JF - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

IS - 1

ER -

Behavioral health treatment redesign in managed care settings

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this