Between dialectic and rhetoric: Rhetorical questions expressing premises in biblical prose argumentation

Adina Moshavi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rhetorical questions expressing premises are situated at the intersection of two disciplines whose object of study is argumentation: dialectic and rhetoric. This paper examines arguments in biblical prose whose premises take the form of rhetorical questions, utilizing insights from modern dialectical and rhetorical theories of argumentation. The corpus for this study is the prose portions of Genesis-2 Kings. The nearly 130 arguments in the corpus were found to exhibit clear logical structures after undergoing reconstruction, although these structures are not necessarily deductively valid. In this, biblical arguments are typical of argumentation in natural conversation. With a few exceptions, the modes of argumentation can be classified as modus tollens, denying the antecedent, argument by consequences, or inductive reasoning. The rhetorical question plays a significant rhetorical role in these arguments, boosting the persuasive force of a disputed premise or a less-than-compelling logical relation between premises and conclusion.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)136-151
Number of pages16
JournalVetus Testamentum
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 28 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.

Keywords

  • Biblical Hebrew
  • argumentation
  • dialectic
  • logic
  • persuasion
  • rhetoric
  • rhetorical questions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Between dialectic and rhetoric: Rhetorical questions expressing premises in biblical prose argumentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this