Abstract
How environmental stress affected past societies is an area of increasing relevance for contemporary planning and policy concerns. The paper below examines a series of case studies that demonstrate that short-term strategies that sustain a state or a specific bundle of vested interests did not necessarily promote longer-term societal resilienceSocietal resilience and often increased structural pressures leading to systemic crisis. Some societies or states possessed sufficient structural flexibility to overcome very serious short-term challenges without further exacerbating existing inequalities. But even where efforts were made consciously to assist the entire community the outcome often generated unpredictable changes with negative longer-term impacts. Greater degrees of baseline socio-economic inequalitySocio-economic inequality at the outset of a crisis are associated with less resilience in the system as a whole, a more uneven distribution of the resilience burden, and an increased risk of post-solution breakdown of a given social order. The historicalHistorical resilience case studies therefore indicate that future policy planners must consider structural socio-economic imbalances when designing and implementing responses to environmental challenges.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | COVID-19: Systemic Risk and Resilience |
| Editors | Igor Linkov, Jesse M. Keenan, Benjamin D. Trump |
| Place of Publication | Cham |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing AG |
| Pages | 235-268 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-3-030-71587-8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2021 |