Beyond dissent and compliance: Religious decision makers and secular law

Netta Barak-Corren*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Throughout history and across many societies, people have been facing conflicts between faith and the law. This article exposes and defines central dynamics of these conflicts by empirically investigating how educational leaders in religious communities tackle, reduce, and resolve conflicts with the law. Three main dynamics emerge: first, religious leaders frequently seek to harmonize law and religion by redefining the conflict around different themes, arguing that 'true religion' raises no conflict with the law or that 'real law' has been misinterpreted by the courts. Second, leaders withdraw religious normativity from conflict zones through nuanced distinctions of sphere and role. Third, religious leaders seek to restrain the reach of legal norms by constraining and reshaping state power. By highlighting the personal and institutional dimensions of conflict reduction and demonstrating the broader explanatory power of the theory, this article contributes to our understanding of one of the most enduring forms of conflict in society.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)293-322
Number of pages30
JournalOxford Journal of Law and Religion
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2017.


Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond dissent and compliance: Religious decision makers and secular law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this