Abstract
This article discusses the quality assessment of binary images. The customary, ground truth based methodology, used in the literature is shown to be problematic due to its subjective nature. Several previously suggested alternatives are surveyed and are also found to be inadequate in certain scenarios. A new approach, quantifying the adherence of a binarization to its document image is proposed and tested using six different measures of accuracy. The measures are evaluated experimentally based on datasets from DIBCO and H-DIBCO competitions, with respect to different kinds of binarization degradations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings - 2016 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, ICFHR 2016 |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
Pages | 495-500 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781509009817 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2 Jul 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, ICFHR 2016 - Shenzhen, China Duration: 23 Oct 2016 → 26 Oct 2016 |
Publication series
Name | Proceedings of International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, ICFHR |
---|---|
Volume | 0 |
ISSN (Print) | 2167-6445 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2167-6453 |
Conference
Conference | 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, ICFHR 2016 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | China |
City | Shenzhen |
Period | 23/10/16 → 26/10/16 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 IEEE.
Keywords
- Binarization
- Evaluation
- Ground truth
- Quality measure