Abstract
Scholars have long recognized that interpersonal networks play a role in mobilizing social movements. Yet, many questions remain. This Element addresses these questions by theorizing about three dimensions of ties: emotionally strong or weak, movement insider or outsider, and ingroup or cross-cleavage. The survey data on the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests show that weak and cross-cleavage ties among outsiders enabled the movement to evolve from a small provocation into a massive national mobilization. In particular, the authors find that Black people mobilized one another through social media and spurred their non-Black friends to protest by sharing their personal encounters with racism. These results depart from the established literature regarding the civil rights movement that emphasizes strong, movement-internal, and racially homogenous ties. The networks that mobilize appear to have changed in the social media era. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Cambridge |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Number of pages | 85 |
| Edition | 1st |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 1009415832, 1009415840, 1009415875, 9781009415835, 9781009415842, 9781009415873 |
| State | Published - 2024 |
Publication series
| Name | Cambridge elements. Elements in contentious politics |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2633-3570 |
Bibliographical note
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 02 Feb 2024).UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Black networks matter: the role of interracial contact and social media in the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver