Abstract
Surprisingly, although the Israeli government adopted unregulated, unorganized, inefficient, uncoordinated, and uninformed governance arrangements during the first wave of COVID-19, the public health outcome was successful, a paradox that this theoretically informed article seeks to explain. Drawing on insights from blame avoidance literature, it develops and applies an analytical framework that focuses on how allegations of policy underreaction in times of crisis pose a threat to elected executives’ reputations and how these politicians can derive opportunities for crisis exploitation from governance choices, especially at politically sensitive junctures. Based on a historical-institutional analysis combined with elite interviews, it finds that the implementation of one of the most aggressive policy alternatives on the policy menu at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis (i.e., a shutdown of society and the economy), and the subsequent consistent adoption of the aforementioned governance arrangements constituted a politically well-calibrated and effective short-term strategy for Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 84-105 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Israel Studies Review |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021. Association for Israel Studies.
Keywords
- COVID-19
- allegations
- blame avoidance
- crisis exploitation
- disproportionate policy
- political executives