Bone Mineral Density Monitoring in Contiguous versus Non-Contiguous Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry

Auryan Szalat, Harold Rosen, William D. Leslie*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Only change in bone mineral density (BMD) on repeat DXA that exceeds the 95% least significant change (LSC) should be considered clinically meaningful. Frequently lumbar spine DXA must be reported after omitting vertebrae with localized structural artifact, which reduces measurement precision. Previous reports have raised concerns of higher least significant change (LSC) when spine BMD is based on non-contiguous rather than contiguous vertebrae. The current study was performed to compare lumbar spine LSC and BMD response to intervening anti-osteoporosis medication use from non-contiguous versus contiguous vertebrae. Methodology: LSCs for lumbar spine DXA based on L1-L4 and all combinations of non-contiguous and contiguous vertebrae were calculated using 879 scan-pairs from the Manitoba BMD Program. We compared BMD change from these regions, overall and in relation to intervening anti-osteoporosis medication use, in 11,722 patients who had 2 DXA examinations. Results: LSCs were slightly greater when calculated from combinations of fewer than 4 vertebrae, but there was no meaningful difference between contiguous versus non-contiguous vertebrae. There were consistently high correlations between lumbar spine BMD change from L1-L4 and all combinations of continuous and non-contiguous vertebrae (all Pearson r≥ 0.9, p<0.001). Percentage changes in spine BMD and the fraction with treatment-concordant change exceeding the LSC were similar using contiguous or non-contiguous vertebrae. Conclusions: Lumbar spine BMD change can be assessed from 2 or 3 non-contiguous vertebrae when clinically necessary, and precision in such cases is similar to using contiguous vertebrae. Non-contiguous vertebrae can detect treatment-concordant changes similar in spine BMD to contiguous vertebrae.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101520
JournalJournal of Clinical Densitometry
Volume27
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry

Keywords

  • Bone mineral density
  • Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
  • Least significant change
  • Monitoring
  • Osteoporosis
  • Precision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bone Mineral Density Monitoring in Contiguous versus Non-Contiguous Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this