Britain and the Palestine question, 1945-48: The dialectic of regional and international constraints

Avraham Sela*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Towards the end of the war, Churchill advocated placing part of the responsiblity for the Middle East - including a long-term settlement of the Palestine problem - on the American government. The Labour government also strove to win the support of the United States for a settlement in Palestine, in order to mitigate Zionist pressures and to legitimize Britain’s Palestine policy in the United States: 8 Based on the State Department’s position this tendency realistically assumed that there was a British-American consensus on the need to resolve the Palestine problem in a way that would preserve Western interests in the Middle East, especially in view of the post-war Soviet threat. To Whitehall’s chagrin, however, the American input became affected increasingly by President Truman’s pro-Zionist intervention, which frustrated repeated British attempts at co-ordination with Washington. Indeed, as Bevin’s biographer commented, ‘The Jewish demands and the Arab reaction were predictable; direct intervention by the American President was not.'".

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDemise of the British Empire in the Middle East
Subtitle of host publicationBritain's Responses to Nationalist Movements, 1943-55
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages220-246
Number of pages27
ISBN (Electronic)9781136313752
ISBN (Print)0714644773, 9780714648040
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2013

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 1998 Routledge & Co. Ltd. and 1998 contributors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Britain and the Palestine question, 1945-48: The dialectic of regional and international constraints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this