Can Oil Windfalls Decrease Fiscal Accountability? Evidence From No-Term-Limit Regimes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We study the impact of oil windfalls on fiscal accountability, vis-à-vis the case of regimes with no term limits. A political economy model of oil windfalls, accountability and term limits indicates that term limit regimes distort the impact of windfalls on accountability, motivating a focus on regimes that impose no term limits. Employing a panel of US states with no term limits over the period 1963–2007, we show that oil windfalls trigger fiscal effects similar to those observed under binding term limits. Namely, taxes and spending increase, lowering state growth in a robust and economically meaningful magnitude, yet only when a Democrat is in office. We show that these patterns hold over the course of several years. Our results shed light on the potential adverse effects of oil windfalls in advanced democracies, as well as more generally on the disciplining effect of elections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)744-765
Number of pages22
JournalAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Volume69
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • fiscal accountability
  • fiscal policies
  • natural resource windfalls
  • term limits

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can Oil Windfalls Decrease Fiscal Accountability? Evidence From No-Term-Limit Regimes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this