Abstract
We study the impact of oil windfalls on fiscal accountability, vis-à-vis the case of regimes with no term limits. A political economy model of oil windfalls, accountability and term limits indicates that term limit regimes distort the impact of windfalls on accountability, motivating a focus on regimes that impose no term limits. Employing a panel of US states with no term limits over the period 1963–2007, we show that oil windfalls trigger fiscal effects similar to those observed under binding term limits. Namely, taxes and spending increase, lowering state growth in a robust and economically meaningful magnitude, yet only when a Democrat is in office. We show that these patterns hold over the course of several years. Our results shed light on the potential adverse effects of oil windfalls in advanced democracies, as well as more generally on the disciplining effect of elections.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 744-765 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s). The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- fiscal accountability
- fiscal policies
- natural resource windfalls
- term limits
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can Oil Windfalls Decrease Fiscal Accountability? Evidence From No-Term-Limit Regimes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver