Can the EU anchor policy reform in third countries? An analysis of the Euro-Med Partnership

Alfred Tovias*, Mehmet Ugur

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

The emerging literature on 'anchoring' draws attention to non-conventional benefits of regional integration arrangements, which include increased policy credibility. Nevertheless, this literature tends to view the anchoring of policy reform as an exogenously given option for a reforming country. We demonstrate that anchoring is an endogenously determined choice, which may guarantee neither optimal levels of policy reform nor effective anchoring unless the relevant contracts are both complete and incentive compatible. We examine the economic pillar of the Euro-Med Partnership (EMP) to ascertain the extent to which its contractual provisions satisfy these conditions. Our findings suggest that the EMP leaves too much room for discretion and does not internalize the positive externalities associated with policy reform. These findings enable us to elaborate on why the EU cannot be expected to function as an effective anchor for policy reform for its trading partners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-418
Number of pages24
JournalEuropean Union Politics
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

Keywords

  • Aid
  • Anchoring
  • Bargaining
  • Conditionality
  • Euro-Med Partnership
  • European Union
  • Free trade areas
  • Policy reform

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can the EU anchor policy reform in third countries? An analysis of the Euro-Med Partnership'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this