Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cancer screening among older women in a culturally insular community

  • Steven M. Albert*
  • , Susan Harlap
  • , Lee Caplan
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. "Culturally insular communities" are defined by a religious or ethnic orientation that effectively places them outside mainstream sources of information on health promotion. We investigated whether older women in one such community were less likely to be screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer than other women in the same geographic area. Methods. A random sample of older orthodox Jewish women in Borough Park, Brooklyn, was compared to white women of the same age in the New York metropolitan area who were surveyed in the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS). Results. Borough Park women aged 50-69 were less likely to report they had been screened for colorectal cancer, and women over age 70 were less likely to report screening for all three cancer prevention modalities. Among Borough Park women, functional and cognitive deficits, elicited by self-report, also reduced the likelihood of screening. Conclusions. Cultural and religious prescriptions are important to consider in health promotion. These factors should be taken into account in designing strategies to promote cancer screening.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)649-656
Number of pages8
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2004
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System
  • Cancer screening
  • Culture
  • Gerontology
  • Jews
  • Women

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer screening among older women in a culturally insular community'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this