Can't We All Just Get Along? How Women MPs Can Ameliorate Affective Polarization in Western Publics

James Adams*, David Bracken, Noam Gidron, Will Horne, Diana Z. O'Brien, Kaitlin Senk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Concern over partisan resentment and hostility has increased across Western democracies. Despite growing attention to affective polarization, existing research fails to ask whether who serves in office affects mass-level interparty hostility. Drawing on scholarship on women's behavior as elected representatives and citizens' beliefs about women politicians, we posit the women MPs affective bonus hypothesis: all else being equal, partisans display warmer affect toward out-parties with higher proportions of women MPs. We evaluate this claim with an original dataset on women's presence in 125 political parties in 20 Western democracies from 1996 to 2017 combined with survey data on partisans' affective ratings of political opponents. We show that women's representation is associated with lower levels of partisan hostility and that both men and women partisans react positively to out-party women MPs. Increasing women's parliamentary presence could thus mitigate cross-party hostility.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)318-324
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Issue number1
StatePublished - 14 Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association.


Dive into the research topics of 'Can't We All Just Get Along? How Women MPs Can Ameliorate Affective Polarization in Western Publics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this