Abstract
Peroxynitrite, ONOO − , formed in tissues that are simultaneously generating NO • and O 2 •- , is widely regarded as a major contributor to oxidative stress. Many of the reactions involved are catalyzed by CO 2 via formation of an unstable adduct, ONOOC(O)O − , that undergoes O-O bond homolysis to produce NO 2 • and CO 3 •– radicals, whose yields are equal at about 0.33 with respect to the ONOO − reactant. Since its inception two decades ago, this radical-based mechanism has been frequently but unsuccessfully challenged. The most recent among these [Serrano-Luginbuehl et al. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 31:721-730; 2018] claims that ONOOC(O)O − is stable, predicts a yield of NO 2 • /CO 3 •– of less than 0.01 under physiological conditions and, contrary to widely accepted viewpoints, suggests that radical generation is inconsequential to peroxynitrite-induced oxidative damage. Here we review the experimental and theoretical evidence that support the radical model and show this recently proposed alternative mechanism to be incorrect.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 210-215 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Free Radical Biology and Medicine |
| Volume | 135 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 May 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Carbon dioxide-catalyzed peroxynitrite reactivity – The resilience of the radical mechanism after two decades of research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver