Career counsellors' perceptions of the severity of career decision-making difficulties

Itamar Gati*, Tamar Amir, Shiri Landman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Individuals differ in the type and severity of the difficulties they face when making a career decision. Relying on the Gati, Krausz, and Osipow (1996) taxonomy of career decision-making difficulties, we elicited the judgements of 28 career counselling experts about factors that contribute to the perceived severity of the difficulties. Difficulties attributed to an internal or emotional cause were judged as more severe than difficulties attributed to an external or cognitive cause. With respect to the consequences, difficulties that prevent making a decision, or those that require long-term treatment, were judged as more severe than difficulties that may lead to a non-optimal decision, and those that require a short-term treatment. The analysis revealed that the factor that most affected the experts' severity judgements was the expected length of treatment. Treatment priority was affected only partially by severity, reflecting the role of other considerations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-408
Number of pages16
JournalBritish Journal of Guidance and Counselling
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Career
  • Career Decision-making Difficulties Questionnaire (CDDQ)
  • Counselling
  • Decision-making
  • Difficulties
  • Indecision
  • Needs assessment
  • Severity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Career counsellors' perceptions of the severity of career decision-making difficulties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this