TY - JOUR
T1 - Category-bounded emotional enhancement
T2 - spillover effects in the valuation of public goods
AU - Bonini, Nicolao
AU - Graffeo, Michele
AU - Hadjichristidis, Constantinos
AU - Ritov, Ilana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/10/3
Y1 - 2019/10/3
N2 - We examined whether enhancing (vs. not enhancing) the emotionality of a referent public good influences the subsequent valuation of a target public good. We predicted that it would and that the directionality of its impact would depend on a fundamental cognitive process–categorisation. If the target and referent goods belong to the same domain, we expected that the effect on the target would be in the same direction as the emotional enhancement of the referent (assimilation effect). However, if the target and referent goods belong to different domains, we expected that the effect on the target would be either negligible or in the opposite direction to that of the emotional enhancement of the referent (null or contrast effect). In Experiment 1 we examined the impact of emotionally enhancing a referent public good on feelings towards a target public good, whereas in Experiment 2 on the willingness to contribute towards a target public good. The results support the predicted interaction, which was driven by an assimilation effect for same-domain goods and a null effect for different-domain goods. In doing so, the present findings highlight the interplay between cognition and emotion in the valuation of public goods. We discuss theoretical and practical implications.
AB - We examined whether enhancing (vs. not enhancing) the emotionality of a referent public good influences the subsequent valuation of a target public good. We predicted that it would and that the directionality of its impact would depend on a fundamental cognitive process–categorisation. If the target and referent goods belong to the same domain, we expected that the effect on the target would be in the same direction as the emotional enhancement of the referent (assimilation effect). However, if the target and referent goods belong to different domains, we expected that the effect on the target would be either negligible or in the opposite direction to that of the emotional enhancement of the referent (null or contrast effect). In Experiment 1 we examined the impact of emotionally enhancing a referent public good on feelings towards a target public good, whereas in Experiment 2 on the willingness to contribute towards a target public good. The results support the predicted interaction, which was driven by an assimilation effect for same-domain goods and a null effect for different-domain goods. In doing so, the present findings highlight the interplay between cognition and emotion in the valuation of public goods. We discuss theoretical and practical implications.
KW - Emotional spillover effect
KW - assimilation effect
KW - categorisation
KW - contingent valuation method
KW - contrast effect
KW - willingness to contribute
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059042467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02699931.2018.1559802
DO - 10.1080/02699931.2018.1559802
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 30580654
AN - SCOPUS:85059042467
SN - 0269-9931
VL - 33
SP - 1330
EP - 1341
JO - Cognition and Emotion
JF - Cognition and Emotion
IS - 7
ER -