TY - JOUR
T1 - Central versus peripheral substrates of persistent pain
T2 - Which contributes more?
AU - Devor, M.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Evidence that central sensitization needs to be maintained in an ongoing manner by nociceptive input from the periphery makes the peripheral drive, rather than the central amplification process, the highest priority target for understanding and control. To stop the peripheral drive is to kill two birds with one stone. Moreover, the amplification that central sensitization does provide is selective and not necessarily striking in intensity. A 'magic bullet' that neutralized central sensitization would probably be less effective in controlling persistent pain than many investigators would like to believe.
AB - Evidence that central sensitization needs to be maintained in an ongoing manner by nociceptive input from the periphery makes the peripheral drive, rather than the central amplification process, the highest priority target for understanding and control. To stop the peripheral drive is to kill two birds with one stone. Moreover, the amplification that central sensitization does provide is selective and not necessarily striking in intensity. A 'magic bullet' that neutralized central sensitization would probably be less effective in controlling persistent pain than many investigators would like to believe.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031404307&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X97291491
DO - 10.1017/S0140525X97291491
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.shortsurvey???
AN - SCOPUS:0031404307
SN - 0140-525X
VL - 20
SP - 446
JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
IS - 3
ER -