Central versus peripheral substrates of persistent pain: Which contributes more?

M. Devor*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Evidence that central sensitization needs to be maintained in an ongoing manner by nociceptive input from the periphery makes the peripheral drive, rather than the central amplification process, the highest priority target for understanding and control. To stop the peripheral drive is to kill two birds with one stone. Moreover, the amplification that central sensitization does provide is selective and not necessarily striking in intensity. A 'magic bullet' that neutralized central sensitization would probably be less effective in controlling persistent pain than many investigators would like to believe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)446
Number of pages1
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Central versus peripheral substrates of persistent pain: Which contributes more?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this