Abstract
Dan Elazar was overly generous with respect to claims of constitutionalism, republicanism, and federalism in the Hebrew Bible, and too free with the term "federalism" for post-biblical Jewish polities. Yet numerous politically relevant episodes in the Bible indicate that the regimes of ancient Israel were something other than purely authoritarian, and modern Israel, though highly centralized in its formal arrangements, tolerates substantial give and take in the operations of national and local authorities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-23 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Publius: The Journal of Federalism |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges to authority that are significant, but fall short of being federal or constitutional'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver