Abstract
This article analyzes China’s coherence in international economic governance. When and how is China challenging the rules and norms of the prevailing international economic order? Has China adopted the current rules and norms across the board, or is it proceeding in an ad hoc or piecemeal manner? How can its (in) coherence be explained? To address these questions, I compare China’s profile vis-à-vis three dimensions of the global economic order: trade, investment, and development aid. I argue that in international trade and investment, China has neither sought nor brought about significant change. China is however, offering an alternative to the Western norms that until now have dominated the global development aid regime. China’s establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is notable in this regard, though it is still soon to determine if the Chinese-led development bank will break with existing norms. The article then considers possible theoretical explanations for the variation in China’s behavior across the three areas.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 123-147 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Journal of Chinese Political Science |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016, Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Bilateral Investment Agreements
- China
- Development Aid
- International Economic Governance
- International Trade
- World Trade Organization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'China’s Coherence in International Economic Governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver