Choosing to Regulate Emotions: Pursuing Emotion Goals in Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Contexts

Moti Benita*, Raz Kehat, Rotem Zaba, Yael Blumenkranz, Gittit Kessler, Avigail Bar-Sella, Maya Tamir

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

We applied self-determination theory to emotion regulation and tested the potential effects of autonomy-supportive and controlling contexts on the pursuit of emotion goals. In four experimental studies (N = 242), participants viewed a fear-eliciting film clip or emotion-eliciting pictures and were prompted to pursue emotion goals with either autonomy-supportive or controlling instructions. Participants in both conditions were equally likely to engage in emotion regulation when directly instructed to do so. However, when they were allowed to spontaneously choose whether to regulate emotions or not, participants in the autonomy-supportive contexts were more likely than those in the controlling ones to independently pursue emotion goals. The latter also engaged in more defensive processing of emotion-eliciting stimuli than the former. These results indicate that people are more likely to pursue emotion goals of their own accord when the context in which they pursue them is autonomy supportive, rather than controlling.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)1666-1680
Number of pages15
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume45
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Keywords

  • autonomy support
  • defensiveness
  • emotion goals
  • emotion regulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing to Regulate Emotions: Pursuing Emotion Goals in Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this