Closure under reversal of languages over infinite alphabets

Daniel Genkin, Michael Kaminski*, Liat Peterfreund

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is shown that languages definable by weak pebble automata are not closed under reversal. For the proof, we establish a kind of periodicity of an automaton’s computation over a specific set of words. The periodicity is partly due to the finiteness of the automaton description and partly due to the word’s structure. Using such a periodicity we can find a word such that during the automaton’s run on it there are two different, yet indistinguishable, configurations. This enables us to remove a part of that word without affecting acceptance. Choosing an appropriate language leads us to the desired result.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputer Science - Theory and Applications - 13th International Computer Science Symposium in Russia, CSR 2018, Proceedings
EditorsVladimir V. Podolskii, Fedor V. Fomin
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages145-156
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9783319905297
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes
Event13th International Computer Science Symposium in Russia, CSR 2018 - Moscow, Russian Federation
Duration: 6 Jun 201810 Jun 2018

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume10846 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference13th International Computer Science Symposium in Russia, CSR 2018
Country/TerritoryRussian Federation
CityMoscow
Period6/06/1810/06/18

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Closure properties
  • Infinite alphabets
  • Reversal
  • Weak pebble automata

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Closure under reversal of languages over infinite alphabets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this