TY - JOUR
T1 - Co-occurrence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease by social class
T2 - 1958 British birth cohort
AU - Power, C.
AU - Atherton, K.
AU - Manor, O.
PY - 2008/12
Y1 - 2008/12
N2 - Aim: To establish whether social differences in multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease are due to a greater strength of association (higher correlation) between risk factors in less advantaged groups. Methods: Co-occurrence of five risk factors (smoking, hypertension, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, obesity, diabetes) in 3614 British 45-year-old men and 3560 women in the manual and non-manual social groups. Results: 4.0% of women in manual groups had ≥3 risk factors compared with 1.7% in non-manual groups: 6.2% and 3.4% respectively for men. There was a higher than expected percentage of the population, overall, with ≥3 risk factors assuming independence between risk factors; correspondingly, there was a slightly lower than expected proportion with one factor. However, patterns of observed to expected ratios were consistent in manual and nonmanual groups and did not differ by the number of risk factors. Conclusions: Higher prevalence of multiple risk factors in manual groups was due to the higher prevalence of individual factors rather than a greater tendency of those with an individual risk factor to have additional risks. Strategies to reduce multiple risk factors in less advantaged groups would help to lessen their health burden.
AB - Aim: To establish whether social differences in multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease are due to a greater strength of association (higher correlation) between risk factors in less advantaged groups. Methods: Co-occurrence of five risk factors (smoking, hypertension, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, obesity, diabetes) in 3614 British 45-year-old men and 3560 women in the manual and non-manual social groups. Results: 4.0% of women in manual groups had ≥3 risk factors compared with 1.7% in non-manual groups: 6.2% and 3.4% respectively for men. There was a higher than expected percentage of the population, overall, with ≥3 risk factors assuming independence between risk factors; correspondingly, there was a slightly lower than expected proportion with one factor. However, patterns of observed to expected ratios were consistent in manual and nonmanual groups and did not differ by the number of risk factors. Conclusions: Higher prevalence of multiple risk factors in manual groups was due to the higher prevalence of individual factors rather than a greater tendency of those with an individual risk factor to have additional risks. Strategies to reduce multiple risk factors in less advantaged groups would help to lessen their health burden.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349128334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jech.2007.068817
DO - 10.1136/jech.2007.068817
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 19008367
AN - SCOPUS:57349128334
SN - 0143-005X
VL - 62
SP - 1030
EP - 1035
JO - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
JF - Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
IS - 12
ER -