Abstract
Government Accountability Office reports and secondary sources reveal that the U.S. Congress has employed three distinct legislative approaches to address the federal counterterrorism information-sharing impasse: coerce, consent, and coax. One main example illustrates each approach: the Homeland Security Information Network project exemplifies the coerce approach; Intellipedia illustrates the consent approach; the office of the Program Manager of the Information Sharing Environment exemplifies the coax approach. Secondary examples are utilized including those of regional Fusion Centers, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the National Counterterrorism Center. The merits and challenges of the three approaches are discussed and compared. The conclusion proposes ideas for using the approach most appropriate to specific counterterrorism challenges.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 674-691 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Terrorism and Political Violence |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 7 Aug 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Counterterrorism
- Federal government
- Information sharing
- USA
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Coerce, consent, and coax: A review of U.S. congressional efforts to improve federal counterterrorism information sharing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver