Abstract
Wagschal and Yeivin comment on a paper by Kamei and Yoshida (ibid., vol.84, p.83, 1983) on the use of mock-up experiments to correct calculated performance parameters of planned power reactors and the estimation of the errors in these parameters. There are two approaches, the cross-section adjustment method and the bias-factor method. It is shown that the Kamei and Yoshida method is a problematic approximation of the uncertainty matrix of the performance parameters and a method for the uncertainties is proposed. Kamei and Yoshida then reply to these comments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 121 - 124 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Nuclear Science and Engineering |
Volume | 86 |
Issue number | 1 |
State | Published - 1984 |
Bibliographical note
LMFBR;core performance parameters;nuclear data uncertainties;large liquid-metal fast breeder reactor;mock-up experiments;performance parameters;planned power reactors;cross-section adjustment method;bias-factor method;problematic approximation;uncertainty matrix;Keywords
- fission reactor core control and monitoring
- fission reactor theory and design