Comment on `Error due to nuclear data uncertainties in the prediction of large liquid-metal fast breeder reactor core performance parameters' [and reply]

J.J. Wagschal, Y. Yeivin, T. Kamei, T. Yoshida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Wagschal and Yeivin comment on a paper by Kamei and Yoshida (ibid., vol.84, p.83, 1983) on the use of mock-up experiments to correct calculated performance parameters of planned power reactors and the estimation of the errors in these parameters. There are two approaches, the cross-section adjustment method and the bias-factor method. It is shown that the Kamei and Yoshida method is a problematic approximation of the uncertainty matrix of the performance parameters and a method for the uncertainties is proposed. Kamei and Yoshida then reply to these comments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121 - 124
Number of pages4
JournalNuclear Science and Engineering
Volume86
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1984

Bibliographical note

LMFBR;core performance parameters;nuclear data uncertainties;large liquid-metal fast breeder reactor;mock-up experiments;performance parameters;planned power reactors;cross-section adjustment method;bias-factor method;problematic approximation;uncertainty matrix;

Keywords

  • fission reactor core control and monitoring
  • fission reactor theory and design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on `Error due to nuclear data uncertainties in the prediction of large liquid-metal fast breeder reactor core performance parameters' [and reply]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this