Abstract
The behaviour of an electron in a one-dimensional short-range potential subject to high-intensity short laser pulses was modelled numerically, by Su et al (1996 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 29 5755) who claimed that stabilization against ionization increases as the frequency is increased for a given intensity. Interpretation of these results as stabilization was challenged in a comment by Geltman (1999 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32 853). We argue that dynamical stabilization is more easily interpreted if comparisons between different frequencies are made for the same quiver amplitudes and pulse shapes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1279-1282 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 28 Mar 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on the stabilization of a one-dimensional short-range model atom in intense laser fields'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver