TY - JOUR
T1 - Comment on “Unveiling the Transition From Paleolake Lisan to Dead Sea Through the Analysis of Lake Paleoshorelines and Radiometric Dating of Fossil Stromatolites” by Jara-Muñoz et el.
AU - Torfstein, A.
AU - Goldstein, S. L.
AU - Bartov, Y.
AU - Stein, M.
AU - Enzel, Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union.
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - Jara-Muñoz et al. report a new set of U-Th and 14C dates obtained from stromatolites scattered along the western slopes of the Dead Sea escarpment and use them to establish a new lake-level curve for part of the last glacial cycle. This curve is fundamentally different from previous reconstructions (Bartov et al., 2002, 2003; Hazan et al., 2005; Lisker et al., 2009; Machlus et al., 2000; Torfstein, Goldstein, Stein, & Enzel, 2013) and is characterized by very significant vertical uncertainties, which in practice, ignore the millennial-timescale resolution of Lake Lisan dynamics that has been widely discussed before (Bartov et al., 2003; Haase-Schramm et al., 2004; Torfstein, Goldstein, Stein, & Enzel, 2013), with important implications for understanding regional hydroclimate regimes and linkage to global climate engines. The differences between the new and previous lake-level reconstructions warrant a critical evaluation of the new findings. We argue that rather than strengthening and refining the existing body of observations, the new data have been used separately, resulting in a misleading record.
AB - Jara-Muñoz et al. report a new set of U-Th and 14C dates obtained from stromatolites scattered along the western slopes of the Dead Sea escarpment and use them to establish a new lake-level curve for part of the last glacial cycle. This curve is fundamentally different from previous reconstructions (Bartov et al., 2002, 2003; Hazan et al., 2005; Lisker et al., 2009; Machlus et al., 2000; Torfstein, Goldstein, Stein, & Enzel, 2013) and is characterized by very significant vertical uncertainties, which in practice, ignore the millennial-timescale resolution of Lake Lisan dynamics that has been widely discussed before (Bartov et al., 2003; Haase-Schramm et al., 2004; Torfstein, Goldstein, Stein, & Enzel, 2013), with important implications for understanding regional hydroclimate regimes and linkage to global climate engines. The differences between the new and previous lake-level reconstructions warrant a critical evaluation of the new findings. We argue that rather than strengthening and refining the existing body of observations, the new data have been used separately, resulting in a misleading record.
KW - Dead Sea
KW - lake level
KW - stromatolite
KW - U-Th dating
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002069558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2024GC011972
DO - 10.1029/2024GC011972
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.comment???
AN - SCOPUS:105002069558
SN - 1525-2027
VL - 26
JO - Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
JF - Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
IS - 4
M1 - e2024GC011972
ER -