TY - JOUR
T1 - Communal identity, political Islam and family law
T2 - Copts and the debate over the grounds for dissolution of marriage in twentieth-century Egypt
AU - Shaham, Ron
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - This article follows the debate over the legal grounds for dissolution of marriage within the Egyptian Coptic Orthodox community during the twentieth century, situating this debate in broader religious, political, social and legal perspectives. In 1999, the Coptic Orthodox Patriarch Shenouda III (r. 1971-) promoted a new draft of unified personal status law for Christians, which considerably limited the grounds for dissolution of marriage. He justified the new draft by claiming that the grounds included in the 1938 Coptic Orthodox personal status code were not supported by Christian scriptures and were adopted by Coptic Orthodox lay leaders of the time, who were inspired by Islamic reformist legislation, to suit their desires and lust. I argue that the 1938 Code was not innovative and that it relied on medieval Coptic Orthodox legal treatises. Patriarch Shenouda's restrictive interpretation of the grounds for divorce was motivated by his desire to invigorate communal identity and cohesion in the face of the strengthening of political Islam in Egypt. More generally, this article demonstrates how legal means and policies are used in the contexts of intracommunal and inter-communal struggles.
AB - This article follows the debate over the legal grounds for dissolution of marriage within the Egyptian Coptic Orthodox community during the twentieth century, situating this debate in broader religious, political, social and legal perspectives. In 1999, the Coptic Orthodox Patriarch Shenouda III (r. 1971-) promoted a new draft of unified personal status law for Christians, which considerably limited the grounds for dissolution of marriage. He justified the new draft by claiming that the grounds included in the 1938 Coptic Orthodox personal status code were not supported by Christian scriptures and were adopted by Coptic Orthodox lay leaders of the time, who were inspired by Islamic reformist legislation, to suit their desires and lust. I argue that the 1938 Code was not innovative and that it relied on medieval Coptic Orthodox legal treatises. Patriarch Shenouda's restrictive interpretation of the grounds for divorce was motivated by his desire to invigorate communal identity and cohesion in the face of the strengthening of political Islam in Egypt. More generally, this article demonstrates how legal means and policies are used in the contexts of intracommunal and inter-communal struggles.
KW - Copts
KW - Egypt
KW - Family law
KW - Grounds for divorce
KW - Political islam
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649685468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09596410.2010.527109
DO - 10.1080/09596410.2010.527109
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:78649685468
SN - 0959-6410
VL - 21
SP - 409
EP - 422
JO - Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations
JF - Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations
IS - 4
ER -