Communications: Rejoinder to Professor Mieczkowski

Nachman Ben-Yehuda*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A communication may take one of two forms. The first relates to correspondence about an article that has appeared in theReview. In this instance the editor will determine whether the initial correspondence from a reader is worthy of publication. In the event that it is, the author of the article in question will have an opportunity to respond to the reader's comment. Both communications will appear unedited. The second type of communication relates to book reviews. It is assumed that this type of communication will be initiated by authors of books who believe their work has been criticized unfairly. In this instance the editor will not determine whether the communication should be published. Instead, it is our intention to allow the reviewer if the book in question to respond to the author's communication and then to permit the author of the book a final rejoinder to the reviewer's communication. All of this correspondence will be published unedited. This policy is designed to assure the essential integrity and purpose of theReview.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-190
Number of pages4
JournalCriminal Justice Review
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1992

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Communications: Rejoinder to Professor Mieczkowski'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this