TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and CLSI M38-Ed3 reference method for determining echinocandin minimum effective concentrations against Aspergillus isolates
AU - Potruch, Assaf
AU - Elinav, Hila
AU - Cohen, Matan J.
AU - Rouvinski, Alexander
AU - Polacheck, Itzhack
AU - Korem, Maya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Potruch et al.
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of echinocandins against Aspergillus spp. does not represent the actual inhibition threshold of echinocandins. Therefore, the recommended method to evaluate their activity is determining the minimum effective concentration (MEC) in broth microdilution, a method that is less common in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess a user-friendly commercial method, Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), to determine the effectiveness of echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin) against Aspergillus spp. Echinocandins MEC was determined against 23 isolates of Aspergillus spp. using SYO and the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method. MECs were read with an inverted microscope and a reading mirror. Essential agreement (EA) between the tested methods was defined as a ±twofold dilution difference. There was a high EA (91%–100%) between the reference method and SYO in determining echinocandins MEC against Aspergillus isolates using inverted microscopy. A high EA was also observed between SYO MEC determined by inverted microscopy and a reading mirror, but different incubation times were required. SYO is a reliable, simple method for determining the MEC of echinocandins against Aspergillus isolates, preferably with an inverted microscope, and can be easily used in clinical laboratories when echinocandin susceptibility testing is required.
AB - The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of echinocandins against Aspergillus spp. does not represent the actual inhibition threshold of echinocandins. Therefore, the recommended method to evaluate their activity is determining the minimum effective concentration (MEC) in broth microdilution, a method that is less common in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess a user-friendly commercial method, Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), to determine the effectiveness of echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin) against Aspergillus spp. Echinocandins MEC was determined against 23 isolates of Aspergillus spp. using SYO and the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method. MECs were read with an inverted microscope and a reading mirror. Essential agreement (EA) between the tested methods was defined as a ±twofold dilution difference. There was a high EA (91%–100%) between the reference method and SYO in determining echinocandins MEC against Aspergillus isolates using inverted microscopy. A high EA was also observed between SYO MEC determined by inverted microscopy and a reading mirror, but different incubation times were required. SYO is a reliable, simple method for determining the MEC of echinocandins against Aspergillus isolates, preferably with an inverted microscope, and can be easily used in clinical laboratories when echinocandin susceptibility testing is required.
KW - Aspergillus
KW - Sensititre YeastOne
KW - broth microdilution
KW - echinocandin
KW - minimum effective concentration
KW - paradoxical effect
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205740664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/spectrum.00280-24
DO - 10.1128/spectrum.00280-24
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 39162550
AN - SCOPUS:85205740664
SN - 2165-0497
VL - 12
JO - Microbiology spectrum
JF - Microbiology spectrum
IS - 10
ER -