Abstract
Integral data have been used for decades to test differential evaluated nuclear data and computational methods. In recent years an intensive international effort led to the preparation of the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments. Unfortunately, the handbook does not include information on measured integral data other than critical masses. The Cross Section Evaluation Working Group Benchmark Specifications contain information on other integral data such as the leakage out of some metallic spheres and on central reaction rate ratios for more assemblies. Two extensive data tests have been reported recently by Los Alamos National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. In this paper we compare the performance of the ENDF/B-VI.3, JEF-2.2, and JENDL-3.2 evaluated cross-section files.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Transactions of the American Nuclear Society |
Place of Publication | USA |
Publisher | American Nuclear Society |
Pages | 166 - 7 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Volume | 78 |
State | Published - 1998 |
Bibliographical note
cross-section libraries comparison;benchmark calculations;computational methods;criticality safety;critical masses;metallic spheres;central reaction rate ratios;ENDF/B-VI.3;JEF-2.2;JENDL-3.2;Keywords
- nuclear criticality safety
- nuclear engineering computing