TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells
AU - Akopian, Veronika
AU - Andrews, Peter W.
AU - Beil, Stephen
AU - Benvenisty, Nissim
AU - Brehm, Jennifer
AU - Christie, Megan
AU - Ford, Angela
AU - Fox, Victoria
AU - Gokhale, Paul J.
AU - Healy, Lyn
AU - Holm, Frida
AU - Hovatta, Outi
AU - Knowles, Barbara B.
AU - Ludwig, Tenneille E.
AU - McKay, Ronald D.G.
AU - Miyazaki, Takamichi
AU - Nakatsuji, Norio
AU - Oh, Steve K.W.
AU - Pera, Martin F.
AU - Rossant, Janet
AU - Stacey, Glyn N.
AU - Suemori, Hirofumi
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories.
AB - There are many reports of defined culture systems for the propagation of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder cell support, but no previous study has undertaken a multi-laboratory comparison of these diverse methodologies. In this study, five separate laboratories, each with experience in human embryonic stem cell culture, used a panel of ten embryonic stem cell lines (including WA09 as an index cell line common to all laboratories) to assess eight cell culture methods, with propagation in the presence of Knockout Serum Replacer, FGF-2, and mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder cell layers serving as a positive control. The cultures were assessed for up to ten passages for attachment, death, and differentiated morphology by phase contrast microscopy, for growth by serial cell counts, and for maintenance of stem cell surface marker expression by flow cytometry. Of the eight culture systems, only the control and those based on two commercial media, mTeSR1 and STEMPRO, supported maintenance of most cell lines for ten passages. Cultures grown in the remaining media failed before this point due to lack of attachment, cell death, or overt cell differentiation. Possible explanations for relative success of the commercial formulations in this study, and the lack of success with other formulations from academic groups compared to previously published results, include: the complex combination of growth factors present in the commercial preparations; improved development, manufacture, and quality control in the commercial products; differences in epigenetic adaptation to culture in vitro between different ES cell lines grown in different laboratories.
KW - Cell culture
KW - Comparative study
KW - Defined cell culture media
KW - Human embryonic stem cell
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952090200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11626-010-9297-z
DO - 10.1007/s11626-010-9297-z
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 20186512
AN - SCOPUS:77952090200
SN - 1071-2690
VL - 46
SP - 247
EP - 258
JO - In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Animal
JF - In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Animal
IS - 3-4
ER -