Abstract
An experimental approach is used to examine the performance of three different multiunit auction designs: discriminatory, uniform-price with fixed supply, and uniform-price with endogenous supply. We find the actual strategies to be inconsistent with theoretically identified equilibrium strategies. The discriminatory auction is found to be more susceptible to collusion than either uniform-price auction and so, contrary to theoretical predictions and previous experimental results, it generates the lowest average revenue. Consistent with theoretical predictions, the actual bid schedules are more elastic with reducible supply or discriminatory pricing than in the uniform-price auction with fixed supply.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 195-235 |
| Number of pages | 41 |
| Journal | Review of Financial Studies |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Competition and cooperation in divisible good auctions: An experimental examination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver